Summary

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California adopted a clean, durable court-control pattern for AI use in filings: if a pleading, motion, or paper was prepared in any aspect using generative AI, the filer must disclose the tool used and certify that the submission was checked for factual and legal accuracy through reliable traditional means. It is a useful legacy reference because it converts general lawyer-AI caution into a simple enforceable certification workflow.

Why It Matters

This is a strong direct lawyers story because it spells out what a court expects from real filing practice.

  • AI use triggers a concrete attestation duty rather than an abstract reminder to be careful
  • the rule requires both identification of the AI program and a certification of factual and legal checking
  • the order applies to attorneys and self-represented litigants alike, showing courts' concern with the workflow, not only professional status

What the Source Says

The court's December 17, 2025 notice says General Order 210 governs use of generative AI in pleadings, motions, and papers and became effective January 1, 2026. The signed order states that any filing prepared in any aspect using generative AI must be accompanied by an attestation or certification identifying the AI program used and certifying that the filer checked the document for factual and legal accuracy using print reporters, traditional legal databases, or other reliable means. The order also says Rule 9011 continues to apply and that each filing is construed as a certification of compliance.